Solo vs. Group
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008Which do you prefer? I’m more of a solo traveler myself, I like keeping my own schedule and having the freedom to break off if I want to. You also learn quite a bit about yourself and what you can handle when you run into snags with no support beyond your own. There are definitely some downsides though, especially if you’re not particularly gregarious. Going out alone in a city can be intimidating, and sometimes you just want to share the experience with someone else. Luckily hostels often provide travelers and backpackers in the exact same shoes, and they’re almost always ready to share a beer or a story. I’ve met some of the most interesting people on the road.
Traveling in a group has its perks as well. You’ve got friends with you that you know and trust, you’ve got support at all times, and someone that’s always up for the next adventure. I don’t mind traveling in a group, provided it’s kept small. Three at max. More than that and you’re asking for trouble, just too many opinions to contend with. I’ve had trips with just one other person that have ended up being great, while spring breaks with 6 or 7 end in disaster.
Right now I’m real content with how Buenos Aires has worked out. Came down here for the first month by myself, then my roomie arrived (whom I already knew from studying abroad in Spain). Small group, good setup, and we’re both chill people. We’ll see once we get some longer trips under our belt though…
explorerevan